Idk. It's not like the existing plan garnered significant across the aisle supporthttps://twitter.com/nomadj1s/status/809836158419136512 …
-
very true. Hindsight is 20/20 here ofc. But the infrastructure started at a compromise position, which seems tepid now
yeah, i think he gave the opposition too much benefit of the doubt in those early negotiations. assumed good faith. nope
-
-
The problem was Pres Obama was insistent on using the 60 vote maj when he should have used the reconciliation proces
-
In the beginning and would have passed without being dependant on the 60 vote majority, your 100% right he gave too
-
much benefit of the the doubt because republican were never going to work alongside him true to their word there
-
only job was to obstruct him. And they did just that. And the sad thing is he still had to go through reconciliation
-
to pass the weak watered down bill because the republicans had no intention of ever working with him
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You rightly complain of Repubs obstructionism during Obama years but act like Dems weren't the same during Bush.Both sides do it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
your remarks on West meeting Trump, so much for improving relations, goes to show your songs are shallow and baseless!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Obamacare would've worked better with the public option, but Joe Lieberman messed that up
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.