no, the voters would decide. Wherever they are, they would count equally. Their state of residence would be irrelevant.
we're so used to this blue-red paradigm that we talk about votes in terms of states when we should talk in terms of people
-
-
You should realize that the potential 4 tyranny of the majority is exactly Y we are a republic & not a democracy.
-
other republics have no electoral college, only the US does. Democracy=majority rule (individuals)
-
In your world, it's OK if a handful of states decide an election?
-
the PEOPLE should decide. Not small or large states.
-
No use arguing w/Trumpsters. It's just like when he said "I could shoot someone on 5th av"
@johnlegend@john_jjsjr@HleloN @Politichick71pic.twitter.com/avoMXwpYOr
-
A lesson we teach our children is to be humble in victory, and gracious in defeat.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ok how about 13% of the people demanding 50% of the pie?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sad he's even learning these divides by just watching the election.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No we talk about color, sex, economic status. My 9 yo asked why. He asked if certain ppl votes counted more.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.