no thanks, we don't need the welfare cities of LA and NYC deciding our President. #HeIsYourPresident
no, the voters would decide. Wherever they are, they would count equally. Their state of residence would be irrelevant.
-
-
-
California and New York help support a lot of red states with our tax money. You're welcome.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
thank you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
we're so used to this blue-red paradigm that we talk about votes in terms of states when we should talk in terms of people
-
You should realize that the potential 4 tyranny of the majority is exactly Y we are a republic & not a democracy.
-
other republics have no electoral college, only the US does. Democracy=majority rule (individuals)
-
In your world, it's OK if a handful of states decide an election?
-
the PEOPLE should decide. Not small or large states.
-
No use arguing w/Trumpsters. It's just like when he said "I could shoot someone on 5th av"
@johnlegend@john_jjsjr@HleloN @Politichick71pic.twitter.com/avoMXwpYOr
-
A lesson we teach our children is to be humble in victory, and gracious in defeat.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Then again, we could always give California the 181 Electoral votes they are entitled to based on population....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.