Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
johnlegend's profile
John Legend
John Legend
John Legend
Verified account
@johnlegend

Tweets

John LegendVerified account

@johnlegend

Chrissy's husband. Father of Luna & Miles. No relation to Arthur.

smarturl.it/AGoodNightVideo
Joined December 2008

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. John Legend‏Verified account @johnlegend Sep 27
      Replying to @johnlegend @DestructiveChem @secupp

      Real, actual, sentient human beings have said they were victims of Kavanaugh and his cronies. The Democratic party didn't make this up. If you want to call the women liars, just say it.

      19 replies 36 retweets 484 likes
    2. Liberal, Not Lefty‏ @liberalnotlefty Sep 27
      Replying to @johnlegend @DestructiveChem @secupp

      Real actual sentient human beings who were her witnesses denied that it happened. Are you saying they lied? Her own witnesses? If you want to call women liars just say it John.

      40 replies 7 retweets 83 likes
    3. Kevin McKinney‏ @KLMcFilth Sep 27
      Replying to @liberalnotlefty @johnlegend and

      What about the other accusers? Do they not count?

      2 replies 1 retweet 18 likes
    4. Liberal, Not Lefty‏ @liberalnotlefty Sep 27
      Replying to @KLMcFilth @johnlegend and

      Ramirez had zero evidence, even the left wing NYT wouldn't publish it, so there's nothing that can or should be done with that at this point. The 3rd also has zero evidence at this point, so again, nothing can or should happen until more evidence comes to light, if it does.

      4 replies 1 retweet 25 likes
    5. Kevin McKinney‏ @KLMcFilth Sep 27
      Replying to @liberalnotlefty @johnlegend and

      I've been sexually abused. I have no tangible evidence I can produce. So, fuck me, right?

      2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    6. Liberal, Not Lefty‏ @liberalnotlefty Sep 27
      Replying to @KLMcFilth @johnlegend and

      I've been sexually assaulted as well, but I'm not using personal anecdotes to guilt trip people. Not "fuck you", or me, or Dr Ford. Whether I believe it happened or not doesn't change the fact a SC nomination shouldn't be denied until credible evidence is given.

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    7. Kevin McKinney‏ @KLMcFilth Sep 27
      Replying to @liberalnotlefty @johnlegend and

      And you shouldn't give someone with this much hanging over them a lifetime appointment to screw with other people's lives.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    8. Liberal, Not Lefty‏ @liberalnotlefty Sep 27
      Replying to @KLMcFilth @johnlegend and

      I think that would set an extremely dangerous precedent the GOP --whom I don't like-- would undoubtedly abuse next time a Dem nominee comes around.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Kevin McKinney‏ @KLMcFilth Sep 27
      Replying to @liberalnotlefty @johnlegend and

      If a Dem gets nominated with 5 sexual assault accusations on them I'm totally ok with investigating before appointing. I don't want that kind of person on the SCOTUS regardless of party affiliation. If you're in that much of a hurry just move to the next nominee.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    10. Liberal, Not Lefty‏ @liberalnotlefty Sep 27
      Replying to @KLMcFilth @johnlegend and

      Like I said, I support an FBI investigation completely. But there needs to be some kind of proven evidence given. Otherwise, you set a precedent of it being okay for the GOP to pay 5 people to accuse the next Dem nominee of sexual assault,& theyd have to lose their nomination too

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
      John Legend‏Verified account @johnlegend Sep 27
      Replying to @liberalnotlefty @KLMcFilth and

      Dr Ford came forward before Kavanaugh was even picked, when he was on a short list. That timeline is critical. It shows the party wasn't paying or inciting her to come forward. She knew he had integrity issues and didn't want him to be picked from the shortlist.

      10:57 PM - 27 Sep 2018
      • 12 Retweets
      • 57 Likes
      • StopHate Ellie A Nahata Paris Joel Tay Spoooooky Travis 👻 Franklin Guerrero JR Howell Jonathan Haellmayer Joshua Crawford
      32 replies 12 retweets 57 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. John Legend‏Verified account @johnlegend Sep 27
          Replying to @johnlegend @liberalnotlefty and

          These are the sorts of details the FBI investigates to help flesh out the facts and assess the credibility of the accusations. GOP doesn't want the investigation because they're afraid of the truth.

          15 replies 2 retweets 31 likes
        3. 2 more replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Brian Cartwright‏ @blcartwright Sep 27
          Replying to @johnlegend @liberalnotlefty and

          1) We can't insist that everything be a binary convinced someone did or didn't. There's always levels of doubt, such as beyond a reasonable doubt or preponderance of evidence.

          2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. Brian Cartwright‏ @blcartwright Sep 27
          Replying to @blcartwright @johnlegend and

          2) So in a confirmation process we can have a lower standard than in a court of law, but even in using 'preponderance of evidence' in Title IX cases to decide if students should be expelled a lot of innocent men have been punished

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Brian Cartwright‏ @blcartwright Sep 27
          Replying to @blcartwright @johnlegend and

          3) But regardless of the level of evidence, how much doubt we choose to tolerate, there's always the basic presumption that the accused is innocent until the accuser can provide enough evidence to show otherwise.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Brian Cartwright‏ @blcartwright Sep 27
          Replying to @blcartwright @johnlegend and

          4) Everyone deserves to be listened to and have their claims checked out, but no one deserves to be believed. I don't believe men, I don't believe women. I believe evidence. And then I judge my level of uncertainty. /end

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        6. 1 more reply
        1. New conversation
        2. Jared‏ @Robotjared Sep 27
          Replying to @johnlegend @liberalnotlefty and

          I don’t think anyone serious on the right questions her sincerity. But you already know the timeline, not sure what you expect the FBI to uncover with no paper trail from 36 years ago, beyond statement taking.

          1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
        3. 1 more reply
        1. New conversation
        2. RaquelLatina ❌-Dem‏ @EstesRC Sep 28
          Replying to @johnlegend @liberalnotlefty and

          Exactly! But Dems chose to sit on it instead of give to FBI to investigate and keep Fords anonymity. Instead they chose to USE Ford as a Hail Mary in a last min obstruction attempt. Plain and simple. They didn’t care about her or her claims. They used her!

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Carmelo Anthony Sche‏ @Schelmety75 Sep 28
          Replying to @EstesRC @johnlegend and

          don't forget the NO TEARS, NO RUNNY NOSE AND NO FACTS!!! Her BFF, leland said she never met kavanaugh with or without Dr. Ford who drove her home???

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. Joseph Sayre‏ @jsayre74 Sep 28
          Replying to @johnlegend @liberalnotlefty and

          And her representative failed her. This could have been brought to the attention of the President then and the nomination would have never occurred. Then, Sen Feinstein failed her and used the letter as a last second political ploy as opposed to investigating it confidentially.

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. JW Watch‏ @JW_Watch Sep 27
          Replying to @johnlegend @liberalnotlefty and

          …and for the record I believe them both. Both without question believe their own stories so I’m left with evidence. Fords own witnesses say the party didn’t happen and her own best friend says she’s never met Kavanaugh. That’s a huge problem.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Liz Orvick‏ @eorvick Sep 27
          Replying to @JW_Watch @johnlegend and

          They didn’t say it didn’t happen. They said they don’t recall...significant difference. They wouldn’t remember a mundane gathering if nothing memorable happened. That’s why Dr. Ford remembers that specific event and her friend didn’t.

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. JW Watch‏ @JW_Watch Sep 27
          Replying to @eorvick @johnlegend and

          I didn’t say “it” didn’t happen I said the party didn’t which is what they all said. They said they have no recollection of this party she claims. She places her friend there but the friend has never met Kav. That’s a HUGE problem. Those are the facts.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Liz Orvick‏ @eorvick Sep 27
          Replying to @JW_Watch @johnlegend and

          You’re repeating what you said before so I will too. The gathering, as Dr. Ford called it, would not have been memorable for anyone who didn’t experience trauma at it...for most of the kids it was forgettable. Who cares that Dr. Ford’s friend didn’t know him, that’s irrelevant.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        6. JW Watch‏ @JW_Watch Sep 27
          Replying to @eorvick @johnlegend and

          If she places her friend at the party but the friend says that can’t be because she never met the guy uhh that’s an issue. Sell yourself whatever makes you feel better but that’s crazy talk.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. Liz Orvick‏ @eorvick Sep 27
          Replying to @JW_Watch @johnlegend and

          She said she doesn’t recall. Again, that’s different than a definitive no. And besides, the friend wasn’t assaulted by him, so why would he be memorable? I don’t remember every single person I ever met at parties. Do you? Trust me. None of this makes me feel better.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        8. End of conversation
        1. Chris Smith‏ @Chitowncecil68 Sep 28
          Replying to @johnlegend @liberalnotlefty and

          She didn't know it she felt it even after this is over and if all of you are proven wrong you would still say he doesn't belong on the court anyways.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info