No, her emotion lends just as much credibility. But truly that’s all we have. She has a poly and her memory. He has HER witnesses denying it. Their emotional testimonies were both powerful. We as a society must now decide what our standard is. And it’s not simple.https://twitter.com/robbie_couch/status/1045519631950254080 …
-
-
Real actual sentient human beings who were her witnesses denied that it happened. Are you saying they lied? Her own witnesses? If you want to call women liars just say it John.
-
What about the other accusers? Do they not count?
-
Ramirez had zero evidence, even the left wing NYT wouldn't publish it, so there's nothing that can or should be done with that at this point. The 3rd also has zero evidence at this point, so again, nothing can or should happen until more evidence comes to light, if it does.
-
We dont know the extent of the evidence because the claims haven't been investigated. They should be investigated
-
I agree they should be investigated and I support one by the FBI. I also think it probably did happen. I just don't think there's enough evidence right now to fairly deny him a nomination. That would set a precedent the GOP could abuse in the future against a Dem nominee too.
-
You don't need a whole lot of evidence to say "maybe there's a better candidate for this lifetime appointment"; you need a lot of evidence to send him to jail. Those two outcomes are worlds apart.
-
*Because* I'm not comfortable with the GOP in the future, paying people to accuse the next Dem nominee of sexual assault and trying to get them disqualified without evidence too, I think an FBI investigation needs to be had & credible evidence given before he should be denied.
-
If that happens, it happens; if it happens repeatedly, then it will be clear something is up, and we will have to deal with it then. Until then, the Supreme court position should be held to the highest possible standards, including this being disqualifying.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh cause all women are the same and none lie huh...? Back to reality Johnny
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She’s a liar! She said the reason she remembered was remodeling her house in 12 and needed a 2nd exit door bc she’s claustrophobic bc of what he did to her! They did remodel in 08! And door isn’t an exit, it’s separate entrance to addition they rent out!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In all honesty John, no, I don’t believe her. I remember more details of my assault when I was 5 than she does when she was 17. She was correct, the memories are “seared” in the brain, but all of them are, not just a few.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only reason we are here is because one senator decided to hold onto information instead of giving it to the FBI whose ability to get the answers needed in an objective timely private non partisan way was intentionally bypassed in order to create a October surprise!
#shamefulThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They’re liars. At least in reference to what happened between them and Kavanaugh. Not a single person has come forward to corroborate her claims — only that she made claims to them 30 years later. The other two...particularly the third, yah she is a straight up liar.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you think Karen Monahan is a liar? She posted medical records. You know, actually evidence.http://www.startribune.com/ellison-ex-girlfriend-posts-medical-record-alleging-abuse/493785421/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Liars
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where are these people?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one is saying that. She's been through something, that's obvious. But at the same time, the witnesses the ACCUSER identified said they have no idea what she's talking about. Four of them. How do you explain that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Poor Dr Ford had something happen to her, but her allegations and shotty memory lead reasonable people to the conclusion she got it wrong... The allegations by others are nothing but a Democrat political hit job, you are naively pushing a manufactured narrative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The third one definitely is, the second one isn't even sure it happened, and the first one can't tell you where or when. That's all the actual evidence you have. You don't even have probable cause.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.