No, her emotion lends just as much credibility. But truly that’s all we have. She has a poly and her memory. He has HER witnesses denying it. Their emotional testimonies were both powerful. We as a society must now decide what our standard is. And it’s not simple.https://twitter.com/robbie_couch/status/1045519631950254080 …
-
-
Real, actual, sentient human beings have said they were victims of Kavanaugh and his cronies. The Democratic party didn't make this up. If you want to call the women liars, just say it.
-
Real actual sentient human beings who were her witnesses denied that it happened. Are you saying they lied? Her own witnesses? If you want to call women liars just say it John.
-
What about the other accusers? Do they not count?
-
Ramirez had zero evidence, even the left wing NYT wouldn't publish it, so there's nothing that can or should be done with that at this point. The 3rd also has zero evidence at this point, so again, nothing can or should happen until more evidence comes to light, if it does.
-
We dont know the extent of the evidence because the claims haven't been investigated. They should be investigated
-
I agree they should be investigated and I support one by the FBI. I also think it probably did happen. I just don't think there's enough evidence right now to fairly deny him a nomination. That would set a precedent the GOP could abuse in the future against a Dem nominee too.
-
You don't need a whole lot of evidence to say "maybe there's a better candidate for this lifetime appointment"; you need a lot of evidence to send him to jail. Those two outcomes are worlds apart.
-
*Because* I'm not comfortable with the GOP in the future, paying people to accuse the next Dem nominee of sexual assault and trying to get them disqualified without evidence too, I think an FBI investigation needs to be had & credible evidence given before he should be denied.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You give her credibility because of what? What evidence beyond her testimony has convinced you? She has made several contradictory statements. Easily excused? Why do you think her best friend is lying about never having been at any get together where he was present?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did Dr Ford provide any evidence? Did she offer any corroborating facts? Yeah, that a no. And she even mixed up details and disputed her therapist’s notes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So much clarity she doesn’t remember where it happened. All of her corroborating witnesses deny being there or even knowing what she was talking about. She doesn’t remember how she got home. Maybe you are confused about the definition of clarity?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did the Democratic party hold on to the evidence for almost two months, leak it to the press against Dr. Ford's wishes, and then demand an FBI investigation into extremely specious charges for no other purpose than to try and prevent him from getting confirmed? Yeah they did.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Uh if it was so clear where and when did she say this crime took place?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Apparently you weren't paying attention to the holes and inconsistencies and just heard what you wanted to hear. The rest of us were listening for evidence and found none.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Where did it happen? When did it happen?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ford's own witnesses denied it happened, John. She has no corroboration whatsoever. It's not just her word against Kavanaugh's. It's her word against four others including her longtime friend.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Democrat Party like Senator Feinstein, who leaked the letter after the hearings were done and never brought it up to Kavanaugh behind closed doors? How about Sheldon Whitehouse who paraded this debunked allegation? https://nypost.com/2018/09/26/man-apologizes-for-making-false-allegation-against-kavanaugh/ … He should be angry at Democrats
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And zero facts or proof. Not even a memory of where it happened or when. You didn’t know Democrats lost their ability to send their KKK to lynch people on the mere word of a white liberal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Clarity? Not hardly. She literally knows virtually nothing and all four other people she claims were there deny it happened. She may believe what she says but there's no evidence it's true. She's not believable, she's sympathetic. I feel sorry for her but that's not enough.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Credibility? HER witnesses do NOT agree.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.