No, her emotion lends just as much credibility. But truly that’s all we have. She has a poly and her memory. He has HER witnesses denying it. Their emotional testimonies were both powerful. We as a society must now decide what our standard is. And it’s not simple.https://twitter.com/robbie_couch/status/1045519631950254080 …
-
-
And I don't think we've ever seen a court nominee display such disdain for the other political party. He obviously can't be even remotely impartial.
-
Hey John, let's see how you address the people who slandered you with accusations of gang rape.
-
Are you calling Dr Ford a liar? Did she make all of this up?
-
Dr Ford accused him with clarity and credibility. The Democratic party didn't.
-
Real, actual, sentient human beings have said they were victims of Kavanaugh and his cronies. The Democratic party didn't make this up. If you want to call the women liars, just say it.
-
Real actual sentient human beings who were her witnesses denied that it happened. Are you saying they lied? Her own witnesses? If you want to call women liars just say it John.
-
What about the other accusers? Do they not count?
-
Ramirez had zero evidence, even the left wing NYT wouldn't publish it, so there's nothing that can or should be done with that at this point. The 3rd also has zero evidence at this point, so again, nothing can or should happen until more evidence comes to light, if it does.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
He lied about Devil’s Triangle. He lied about boofing. He lied about the “Renate alumnius” [sic] line. Just like
@realDonaldTrump he lied about small things and likely is lying about the bigger things. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
You Yanks don’t need any more liars in senior positions






-
Bah. What’s one more?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He lied about the commonly known meaning of slang instead of just laughing it off. That was completely mystifying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
His temperament and penchant for perjury (no matter how small a lie) disqualifies him from sitting on our highest court. He has shown zero interest in seeking the truth and threw any semblance of impartiality out the window with his opening tirade.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He lied under oath. That is against the law. He also likely lied in the FBI background checks they DID do. That's a felony. If there is any justice at all left in the world, he will be impeached and end up in jail.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He definitely lied about his Urban Dictionary phrases.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And who paid off his "baseball ticket" debts and why?
-
WHAT? OMG? DEPORT HIM NOW!
-
The fake outrage shows your ignorance. If a SCOTUS nominee is (possibly) financially beholden to a benefactor that paid off $200k in debt, he would be considered compromised and unable to be impartial. We would simply like an explanation of how the debt got paid.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.