No, her emotion lends just as much credibility. But truly that’s all we have. She has a poly and her memory. He has HER witnesses denying it. Their emotional testimonies were both powerful. We as a society must now decide what our standard is. And it’s not simple.https://twitter.com/robbie_couch/status/1045519631950254080 …
-
-
He lied about his involvement in Bush policy decisions and judge nomination campaigns. He most likely lied about the extent of his drinking and other things he could have admitted to. He's not to be trusted.
-
And I don't think we've ever seen a court nominee display such disdain for the other political party. He obviously can't be even remotely impartial.
-
Hey John, let's see how you address the people who slandered you with accusations of gang rape.
-
Are you calling Dr Ford a liar? Did she make all of this up?
-
Dr Ford accused him with clarity and credibility. The Democratic party didn't.
-
Real, actual, sentient human beings have said they were victims of Kavanaugh and his cronies. The Democratic party didn't make this up. If you want to call the women liars, just say it.
-
Real actual sentient human beings who were her witnesses denied that it happened. Are you saying they lied? Her own witnesses? If you want to call women liars just say it John.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
And he's clearly biased! His opening statement alone was so partisan. And who owns him? Who cleared his debt? And what kind of judgement can a man with such a debt have? He doesn't rise to the level required for
#SCOTUS . Not by a long shot. -
He is so full of bs & ready to lie. He’s done it his whole life no doubt, having to play good Catholic boy while downing beers & planning assault. He’s been prejudiced against Dems his whole career. Namedropping Clinton was a look into a fully committed partisan soul. The worst!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No one denied it happened except K. All the witnesses said they don’t remember. Big difference. And, one said she believed Ford.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I will be honest & say I didn’t even think about his politics until today when he made them so crystal clear & sounded like he was reading a
#Trump speech! He is the one that said no jurist can take politics into court. He proved today by his own statement, he is disqualified! - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Like what?
-
1) his drinking habits 2) Reanate Alumnus 3) Boof/Devils triangle 4) Whether he watched Dr Ford’s testimony
-
And that was all just *today*, not getting into some of his prior testimony about his work in the Bush White House. In fact, I have never seen him acknowledge any mistake or error of any kind. The inability to be self-reflective and take personal responsibility is an issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I am soooo sick of the false equivalence in this matter. NO. Only one side is right & good. The other is harboring some very ugly lies & secrets & will just about do anything to hide that. Including screaming & crying & playing victim. So no. There is no equal measure here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
No, that’s trump supporters
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.