RU able 2recognize & accept that conversely its no coincidence many of those who SAY they believe these conveniently-timed hideous stories are also avid abortion RIGHTS people? Policy disagreements happen but they’re NOT a reason to DESTROY an “innocent until proven guilty” man !
-
-
-
He’s not on trial; he’s going through a job interview for a lifetime appointment, and should be scrutinized as such.
-
Obtuse much. Interrogated on network TV, under oath (at least HE will be) is not a job interview. BTW, Wanna take a wild guess why the accuser does not want to testify under oath? I’ll wait.
-
You don’t need to take a wild guess, it’s not a secret, she doesn’t want to testify due to people like you
@JohnDennisWEEI who want to claim she is making up what Kavanaugh did, and those that want to victim blame -
BTW.... tried to pay just a little bit of attention. She WANTS to testify....just NOT under oath. Got it

-
She is testifying under oath. First sentence of second paragraphpic.twitter.com/66hFnZEDUr
-
I’m amused by all these white men and their proclamations. So confident. Like they have the privilege to tell a woman what to do... . Time’s up.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If this alleged attempted Rape happened. Why is there no evidence. You can't convict without evidence, But you can ruin a person's reputation from an alleged none corroborated story. So yes
#ConfirmKavanaugh -
There’s this entity called the FBI that can find precisely such evidence. Strange that you Trumphumpers haven’t called for their involvement.
-
Yes the FBI has done 6 background checks. All 6 inquires came up with nothing. In the real world you need evidence.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, yes, yes. These “pro-life” men continually prove that their anti-abortion views have nothing to do with valuing life and everything to do with controlling women...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Himpathize great word
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Actually, they aren't being hypocritical at all. They are against women having a choice in every way, and in everything. It's pretty dang sad.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They aren’t “Pro-Life” they are “Pro-Forced Childbirth”. It’s not the baby they are protecting, it’s the power over women.
-
Sorry but no. We don’t like killing unborn babies. It’s not about control, it’s about saving unborn lives.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
First, we do empathize with them, and to make such generalized statements is fallacious. Second, our hearts and empathy are also fiercely with those unborn hearts and minds.
-
And guess who wins in your little ethical balancing game? Not the living, breathing, AUTONOMOUS woman, over whom you have no say at all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.