You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
You didn't just run the quotes. You sent the entire article to Kobach for approval. That's not normal.
You've obviously an answer that you're trying to justify. Along w. sending to the subject to check his quotes, I sent WHOLE ARTICLE to election law experts Jay O'Callaghan & Hans von Soakovsky to double check complex terms he used on voter I'D. I hope you Don't have a problem.
Thanks for this clarification. It's interesting that Hans didn't turn that email over to the commission.
Low-key, but very real, looooooooool.
Isn't it your job to check the quotes based on primary sources, and not the speaker themselves? And if you wanted to send it to "election law experts", why not include "experts" who *aren't* extremely conservative? For example, a current law school professor?
If one doesn't record interviews-which I now do always--it is a good idea to run quotes past them. I don't mind sending a full article w. the caveat that all that is subject to change are their words. In '13, I misquoted someone & felt terrible about it. I said "never again."
That caveat didn’t exist in your email to Kobach.
I certainly told him that--as I did Hugh Hefner in 2000--when I began the interview & said I wasn't recording (which I feel one has to disclose one way or another).
It’s not clear to me, why if all that is subject to change is the quotes, you cannot just send the quotes themselves. You have to know that the practice you are describing is absolutely not industry standard.
You should come to my talk to the National Journalism Ctr. If you can't record--which I do almost always now--it is wise to read quotes back. Before email, I used to read quotes on phone. I'll try to dig up letter from Hugh Hefner in 2000 thanking me for accuracy in interview.
Again, that’s achievable by sending quotes and not the full article. It’s unclear to me why you are ignoring that.
And apologies if I don’t take my journalism ethics guidance from Hugh Hefner. You cannot be serious.
Hey, just fyi, and for future reference, the federal judge in Kobach's trial disagreed pretty strongly about Spakovsky being an "election law expert[]." Thought you'd want to know!
Poor Johnny. He thinks wearing a fedora makes him a crack reporter.
Can we see that other correspondence as well our fearless leader said not to trust the press and all. I get the feeling this is #fakenews?
Hahahaha some “journalist” You are. Lapdog .
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
