@speechboy71 if they wanted to include themselves they just say "all cong staff"
@speechboy71 did you get the timeline w links from my press sec Stephen Worley? It proves that what I told you was true
-
-
@johnculberson Yes I got it Thanks for sending! -
@speechboy71 it looks like my memory was correct - not trying to be right just accurate - what is your impression of seq of events? -
@johnculberson So even if your argument is correct then the inclusion of Pelosi staff exempting themselves is incorrect
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@johnculberson However, it raises a number of questions: you said Pelosi/Reid staff exempted themselves, but language was in Senate bill -
@speechboy71 Coburn passed first, app only to Cong & personal staff; then Grassley passed applied to everyone; goes to conf comm then -
@johnculberson Ok, according to Reid's staff they used Coburn language because they were concerned that Grassley proposal was too broad
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.