This paragraph needed a better editor. Not-one denies Facebook is an ad business. And given it’s the lynch pin of the argument, that means the whole piece fails.pic.twitter.com/hHMVLsFnxU
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
This paragraph needed a better editor. Not-one denies Facebook is an ad business. And given it’s the lynch pin of the argument, that means the whole piece fails.pic.twitter.com/hHMVLsFnxU
The whole piece is just begging the question. The crucial point made is that all these problems flow from the ad business & therefore can’t be fixed, but those are unsupported assertions. Why are either true? What would a sub model change? Don’t the decisions come from product?
There can be ad-models with less negative externalities. I don't think subs are magic; I also don't breaking up Facebook would create the change people sometimes hope for--we'd likely get more vicious smaller Facebooks. Its monopoly position allows for some restraints.
I do think there's a range of alternatives to explore; including technical paths that are underexplored. I'm not glib; no one sentence solution. But the current incentive structure for an ad-business at that scale creates the clear pattern we saw—within the dynamics I said above.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.