really? did he ask someone to calm down and have a conversation? that's just awful! he should be banned from using the internet!
-
-
Replying to @2xb @CHERdotdev and
Why should someone who just abused another have the right to have a conversation with the victim just b/c some other dude wants to be mediator? If I was abused there's no way I'd want to have a convo with the person. Why would I?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @john_codeinaire @CHERdotdev and
1) "shut up" does not constitute abuse - it might be insulting but c'mon, let's all pony up a bit. 2)
@unclebobmartin does not misrepresent facts, he points out very dangerous precedent. 3) by joining in does not misrepresent facts, he p out very dangerous precedent.shouls4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @2xb @john_codeinaire and
It is a misrepresentation of the facts. He attributes his revocation of being invited to posting a picture of himself in a MAGA hat, when he stated himself the reason was tone policing. Telling women to "shut their mouths" was a small part of the abusive tirade he went on.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CHERdotdev @john_codeinaire and
1) AFAIK
@linuxfoundation didn't provide any rationale for the ban. Both, you and@unclebobmartin made an assumption. 2) "telling *women* to shut up". Forget that there was a woman involved. Telling ppl to "shut up" is impolite at most.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @2xb @CHERdotdev and
It wasn’t just telling someone to shut up. Here are the screens of the abuse.pic.twitter.com/OOrg4zxZuF
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @john_codeinaire @2xb and
that's not abuse. Definition of abuse is - "treat (a person or an animal) with cruelty or violence, especially regularly or repeatedly." What he said might have profanity in it but it's an expression of opinion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_contrarian @2xb and
Would you hang out with a person you saw doing that in IRL? Would you trust that person? It was a directed abusive attack. I know I'd not be okay with that behaviour in person. I'd not want to hang out with them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @john_codeinaire @2xb and
I would. But that's up to me to decide who's my friend or not. >It was a directed abusive attack Definition of attack - "take aggressive action against (a place or enemy forces) with weapons or armed force, typically in a battle or war." There was no weapons or force here.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_contrarian @john_codeinaire and
do my replies constitute an attack as well?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
To me they do not.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
