According to @PoojaLoftus (who, unlike me, works with real world data), this statement is like a general visiting the trenches after years of battle and asking the soldiers if they knew which direction the enemy was in
-
-
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Thanks, Hugo!
@joftius you might like this:http://bit.ly/quaesita_damnedlies …
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
Because that stuff is more difficult to teach. But there is stats education like that. Type 3 errors are mention in lecture 1.1https://www.coursera.org/learn/improving-statistical-questions …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
because mechanical procedures are easier to teach than independent thinking?
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
oh my god i had no idea there was a term for this and i feel like my underlying unease with four years of university science and statistics education just became material
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Maybe it's because hypothesis *formulation* is not really part of statistics education in a strict sense. Which is a problem. A solution: Integrate teaching of statistics with general issues of methodology and even philosophy of science, but also with content-oriented lectures.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Statistics and machine learning have been mistaken for predictive theories when they are merely (sometimes) predictive.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.