Somebody needs to directly rebut Lamar’s argument about precedent. He claims removal now would open the door to future, frivolous impeachments//
-
-
-
We have no evidence of impeachment being used excessively. The best case you have against its use is the Clinton one.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Because
@SenateGOP is running a cover up not a trial -
Yes you are right of course. I was taking his argument seriously for a moment. I was accepting his premise about elections.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
Yes, I expect that you are right about that. If we knew the things he's hiding, we'd be in the streets in droves
Kraj razgovora
-
-
-
Officer, I admit I ran the red light. Let me go and you can ticket me when I run the next one.
#ImpeachmentHearingsHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Because Republicans might lose power. He was perfectly clear about this.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Because everything will come out (all the horrors as Adam Schiff put it, and he knows way more than most of us), and Republicans will need to seem surprised.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
They were too afraid of what they'd find (and probably already know). They would have been forced to convict if we saw the facts, so the cowards clutched to the power they hold over the constitution they took am oath to protect. They're forever soiled in the history books.
-
Even if there is a tape of Trump directing it he will get acquitted. I think censure would actually have been a better punishment. We are simply not gonna remove a president for that Ukraine mess
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.