Have you had a chance to talk to @maybekatz about this? Might be helpful to brainstorm together :)
-
-
I'm down if she's interested
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
What do you think about licensing that tries to embed ethics like restrictions on human rights abusers?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I take the advice of more qualified folks here, which is that licenses are the wrong place for that buuuut... One thing I like about
@LicenseZero is that I might choose to just not sell licenses to unethical entities, which is something I'd like to explore1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @maybekatz @joenihl and
What other mechanisms do we have for embedding ethical restrictions into usage of our software, besides licenses?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I don't know if embedding in the licenses themselves will work, but embedding them into the license sale might?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @maybekatz @sarahmei and
But how can that apply to free software?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
By creating two worlds: one for the community, available for free, and one available to corporate overlords, available for pay and consent. I don't believe permissive licenses or even most free software licenses can create this split though
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @maybekatz @sarahmei and
What if it's not a corporation but a country like North Korea or Iran? How can free software protect itself from being distributed across such national boundaries?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
How can even proprietary software protect itself in those cases? If the US government wants to violate licenses to bomb children, there's nothing you can do.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Google seems to have been blocked from supporting Chinese coorporations but no such recourse seems to exist for the FOSS community.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.