“Consistent, meaningful and transparent consequences”— someone at Chesa’s office agreed to that? Appreciate your work as always Tom, even if this plan seems to be missing the tough love that will be necessary to actually solve things.https://twitter.com/Twolfrecovery/status/1410773987324354563 …
-
-
Replying to @enuffisenuffla
Actually, no. His office did not agree with it. But enough of us did to barely, get it in there.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Twolfrecovery @enuffisenuffla
What was their argument in opposing this? That there shouldnt be a consequence to drug dealing!!! I am trying to understand what is the justification they provided in objecting to this statement.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Twolfrecovery @enuffisenuffla
What!?After seeing the consequences in TL they still dont believe that dealers should face consequences. I am not for war on drugs but it has to be understood in the context that war shouldnt be waged on users but there should be consequences for dealing.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If a pharm comp like purdue flood the markets with drugs will
@chesaboudin not prosecute them because its a war on drugs.. I am trying to understand here.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I am pretty sure he will be screaming blood murder which he should but why this apologist attitude towards illegal drug dealing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.