My dude, if you can’t get 50 votes for witnesses, you can’t get 51 for a censure.
-
-
-
It would be the House that Censured him, not the Senate.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Censure gives Republicans an easy, painless way to wrap up this whole mess and put it behind them. It allows the GOP to say, "Look, we didn't *completely* abdicate our responsibilities to the Constitution -- we gave him a slap on the wrist!" Democrats should not fall for this.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I’m thinking it just gives the
@gop an “out”. If it’s bad enough to censure, it’s bad enough to remove. They argue there must be a “Vote By The People” and Impeachment is invalid. Let them die on that sword.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
How about a
#MISTRIAL .??Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Which Senate members will do that? Come on - they don't want the people to see anything, let alone admit he may have done something. That would be admitting they are either inept or corrupt, or both.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
A bipartisan call to incarcerate the President is urgent.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
#MoscowMitch would never allow such a resolution to reach the Senate floor. He was constitutionally obligated to at least go through the motions of a trial; he has no similar obligation vis-à-vis censure.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.