Conversation

This whole existence thing is some kind of fukn fluke, an accident of chemistry. Abiogenesis happened and 4 billion years later, here we are. Damn you, chemistry!
1
2
9
As a philosopher do you agree you might be hallucinating your entire life in which case there’s no chemistry and you might wake up and realise you’re an angel having a nightmare?
1
Isn’t it possible you’re an angel living in a blissful universe, currently having a brief nightmare in which your life, all suffering, the earth, are just elements of the dream from which you will wake up realising none of it objectively existed?
1
As inmendham has said, it’s a fn molecule. That line is one of my favorites. I’m doing the bidding of a molecule with no aim outside of continuity into the future. Word salad unfortunately.
1
1
Replying to and
Of course the mechanism of DNA replication is well elucidated. But abiogenesis etc is highly speculative. For example, they say it happened by *accidental* mixing of chemicals. Surely if that’s the case people could *deliberately* make it happen in a lab. But they can’t!
1
1