Conversation

antoine sugar
@joedan346
That may be true about Schopenhauer, but, the point of my tweet was that environmental "activists" are oblivious to the real danger to the environment: humans and their progeny.
Quote Tweet
Be Child Free, Ok?
@abisjajo
·
A friendly reminder to all fellow antinatalists that loss of wildlife & rainforests is the Schopenhauerian ideal. Upon observing the suffering of animals and people, he wishes the earth could have the same sterile landscape as the moon. twitter.com/joedan346/stat…
7:50 AM · Jul 7, 2019Twitter Web Client
2
Likes
Be Child Free, Ok?
@abisjajo
Replying to
@joedan346
We are agreed! Procreation destroys the environment. Therefore environmentalists who reproduce are hypocrites. Additional point: Destroyed environment impairs procreation. Therefore antinatalists should support fossil fuel corporations and rain forest loggers. Are we agreed?
1
antoine sugar
@joedan346
It matters not whether one does or doesn't "support" consumption & degradation of the natural resources because that is the way it is by default & the way it's always been. One can only accept reality or not. To not accept it only increases one's suffering.
1
Show replies