Powerful statement this morning from @conservancy, another free software nonprofit: “We [...] want to underscore that allowing Stallman to continue to hold a leadership position would be an unacceptable compromise.”
#cancelstallmanhttps://twitter.com/conservancy/status/1173603417769545734 …
-
Show this thread
-
It continues: ”Most importantly, we cannot support anyone, directly or indirectly, who condones the endangerment of vulnerable people by rationalizing any part of _predator_ behavior.” (emphasis mine) That’s an important word to have in this discussion.
1 reply 3 retweets 40 likesShow this thread -
Worth reading the whole thing. Aligning social justice with software freedom is not an approach I’ve seen officially before.https://sfconservancy.org/news/2019/sep/16/rms-does-not-speak-for-us/ …
4 replies 9 retweets 39 likesShow this thread
Sorry, still you want to put together things that cannot. Can you explain how social justice might be related with software freedom? You are basically saying that the man who founded a movement about software freedom cannot be free to express his own thoughts. It's about freedom.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
