It may be the most productive but it’s not what he said. It’s your spin.
-
-
-
No, that was s pretty accurate take.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I'm genuinely shocked that a scientist like Tyson would even deign to tweet this.
-
Dispassion is a hallmark of science. I work in a hospital, and in the beginning I used to react to stuff happening. Now, I see things with detachment. You have to in order to function in the chaos.
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I think he is trying to be objective. That is the role of a scientist.
-
The role of the scientist to explain why people react the way they do, not to suggest they are overreacting. Tossing out decontextualized data points doesn't make it "objective." At best, he was trying to provide perspective, but he's playing out of his lane.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
True. But telling
@neiltyson to go *** himself with his transparently phony tweet (and its obligatory inclusion of the word "horrifically" to feign empathy) is much more satisfying. -
He's got a serious empathy gap. Better go to the doctor and have that checked. You know, a scientist who specializes in people, not far off galaxies?
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
And we can call out that there are gun homicides on a daily basis yet we only show collective outrage and demand action (what ever that may be) when it involves mass shootings as if the country all of a sudden remembers that we have a gun violence epidemic.
-
I believe that was his point.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.