Under this new directive will police still respond to overdose calls? At least 4,000 people overdosed in San Francisco last year. Many of those were reversed because they were on the scene quickly. Will this response be affected? @LondonBreedhttps://news.yahoo.com/unarmed-professionals-now-respond-non-011925701.html?soc_src=community&soc_trk=fb …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Politicians are notorious for passing laws without the proper infrastructure in place. See Prop. 47.
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Similar to Haney/Ronen mental health SF. Sounded great, big problem. But, massive obligation proposed without funding, open ended (no residency requirement), paid even if private insurance available. No coordination with responsible agency. Shocked later to learn many beds empty.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
you mean the lack of staff how could a city attract mental health workers to one of the most expensive cities in the world while paying city wages? a lot of people live in some imaginary world where mental health professionals are driven by vocation
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Good question. And probably something to figure out *before* proposing an unfunded, absolute obligation ie “human right” available to anyone, from anywhere in the world, who happens to step foot in San Francisco.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
it is not a question john get thinking buddy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This is not a question? “how could a city attract mental health workers to one of the most expensive cities in the world while paying city wages?”
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.