Risks to manage: 1. Strategics less likely to follow on if you need additional capital 2. Presence of strategics can sometimes complicate partnerships/sales to their competitors 3. When they do go active, vs passive, their interests are often not aligned w cap table/founders
-
-
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
#1 is so important for exit and outcome with founders. A direct line of communication and relationship with Corp dev early on is huge.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Stripe is just getting started. Everyone should boot strap their idea to profitability and then VCs and Stripe and alike should pour money on them to accelerate. I’m on my second Stripe advance now and it’s been a blessing
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Plus it's a path toward exiting
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
They probably raised a separate fund for investing in startups instead of using VC money. Like what Slack did with their joint fund with A16Z.
Kraj razgovora
-
-
-
Very true for a company looking for a big check. So many Co’s out there that want to roll equity & build better business, find new customers & enter new markets. A lot of the growth GPs in tech, software, services are almost strictly exiting to strategics instead of other PE
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Yes on 2 but surely the path to a return has to be soooo much clearer
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
What companies has Stripe invested in?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.