You obtained it by taking the photo from my twitter feed: https://twitter.com/wabermes/status/867745002050514944 …https://twitter.com/jmartNYT/status/867756071904886784 …
When you tweet with a location, Twitter stores that location. You can switch location on/off before each Tweet and always have the option to delete your location history. Learn more
Look at those pics side by side. They are the exact same. Same piece of paper redacting personal information, same shadow. That's my photo.
only difference is that it was resized & compressed & (which pushes the color off a tad):pic.twitter.com/twyyog4eLs
is it possible you were both provided the same image?
Whitney got the info, took the photo, posted it, and it was then "obtained."
she said she got a copy. Could mean someone copied it for her & also provided it to NYT. Not an unreasonable thing to think.
She got a copy of the record. That is literally HER photo. Complete with her shadow.
ok, I believe you. But "copy" is different than "photo". She'll want to watermark it next time.
That's not how newspapers work. We don't watermark photos - we aren't taking senior pictures.
It's amazing to watch people draw the most ridiculous lines in the sand.
So how did you get the exact same copy and verify its accuracy before posting?
This seems like a pretty simple question to answer—if one has been truthful.
So someone sent you her twitter pic and you didn't know it was her work. No problem! Just tweet an update with proper credit.
is that how NYT journalism works? just using any pic that was sent to you without doing research? explains a lot.
@superjaberwocky Really disappointing to see a @nytimes correspondent refuse to give credit to a local reporter. 1/
Maybe you got it fr someone else who took it from her feed but it's obvious it's the same. 2/
Please apologize and give proper credit. It's the least you can do at this point. /end
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.