Jonathan Mannhart

@JMannhart

Cognitive Science . Effective Altruism, Bayes, happiness/mental health, AI Alignment, reward hacking, mountainbiking, reading books, looking for aliens.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2012.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JMannhart

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JMannhart

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    4. velj

    "Don't worry about Coronavirus more people died of flu today." "Don't worry about the flu, the number of people infected isn't rising 50% a day and we know its case fatality rate is low." I know which I find more persuasive.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    Never use Academia-not-edu or ResearchGate. If you want to share your working papers, put them on your website or use an open archive. It's a disgrace that the academia thing even has a .edu domain.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    . has really upped their game lately. Their pages are so damn useful, e.g. see below. Congrats !

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij

    is closest its ever been to midnight People asked me "can that really be true?". I'm a Cambridge Uni existential risk researcher and my view is: unfortunately yes TL:DR nuclear situation worse than last 30 yrs, climate situation worse ever, and new bio + AI risks

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    22. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    This was one of the most depressing and yet motivating data I've seen on this topic of who we spend our time with and it's finiteness..

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    All my RTs today: trying to amplify the growing opposition to a terrible idea of a show - one that promotes misinformation and spreads harmful myths about health.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Unfortunate that is jumping on the bandwagon of exploiting the gaps in women's health care. This won't improve anything but 's bottom line.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Hi - your content is a highlight of my day but as a doctor who has to fight misinformation including caring for people who follow instead of doctors and wind up sick, I’d be grateful if you could create content with good science and less woo.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. sij

    Just saying that could have given me a show that was much more scientific for MUCH cheaper.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Hypersonics will render all missile defense systems useless and dramatically shorten the window for second-strike capabilities. A hugely underrated issue.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    I understand. But we must be stoic Poppers and let bad ideas ... die. Emotional investment is a nasty bias that drives and crashes lots of animal cognition research (a field with huge replication and interpretation problems). See here, too:

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Please stop with stupid hot takes like this. Your own article says *all* data centers are responsible for something like 0.3% of global emissions. 🙄 Please stop hyping the non-issues for click-bait, and let’s get to work on the real climate solutions.

    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I have a theory that these terrible (and often wrong) hot takes are actually designed to get people to stop caring about combatting climate change altogether. I promise climate scientists don’t actually care that you just binged The Expanse. Half of us did, too.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    When I worked at Lumosity we had a test like this, and it would compare you against this chimp’s scores. Many people were able to beat the chimp after practicing.

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. sij

    This debunked finding keeps coming back. Humans are at least as good at this task as the chimpanzees. It's a practice effect. See replies in the thread. Good television makes for bad theorizing.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Wrong. Humans can do the same, when trained.

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. pro 2019.

    What did it take to get those screenshots? To decipher them? To recreate the interface at the moment of catastrophe? To show us, in detail, the user’s experience of a catastrophe? I can’t imagine. is a nonprofit. Maybe send a few bucks their way.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. pro 2019.

    This is the point in the story where my head exploded. You’re steering a warship. Each control at your station might affect the ship. Or it might do nothing. Nothing on each control clearly indicates whether it’s active. If you operate an inactive control? No warning. 😱

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Thread: 50 years ago, on Dec. 4, 1969, Chicago cops killed 21-year-old Black Panther, Fred Hampton Hampton's death wasn't just another police murder. Even more than MLK or Malcolm X, Hampton's murder might be the most important black assassination in US history. Here's why:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·