Type I and Type II have only two syllables each. Makes sense to use if mentioning it several times a day.
-
-
-
I don't feel like I've ever felt slowed down the extra syllables. Also avoids needless obfuscation so saves time that way
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or even better(?): choose a form of words that fits the specific problem you are studying.
-
what do you mean exactly?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
generally agree, but there's an appealing neutrality to 'type I' and 'type II'. Not so for pos/neg - the context might confuse
-
interesting point
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why? I don't think I understand.
-
I feel that the terms are unnecessarily obfuscating. We should say what we mean, not just use jargon for its own sake
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
.
@jgschraiber@trayc7 In my brain, stats are onomatopoeic : false positive⇒splat false negative⇒whiff true positive⇒ding true negative⇒honk - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.