Yes because they are unable to defend their client in any straight forward way.
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Now we are back at Benghazi!


-
Sigh, I was just waiting for this to be mentioned. They do not disappoint.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Trump's team: 'you moved too fast in the house hearings.' House managers: 'shouldn't we have witnesses?' Trump team: 'it takes too long to get witnesses. We will appeal each request all the way to the supreme court.'
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I wanted to say that the new beautiful investment of billions of dollars on a state of the art wall has begun to fall down. I think it landed on some trees in Mexico. So Mexico is supporting Trumps wall. But Trump is going to put $100,000,000,000 in rubber bands for flexing

-
Oh my that funny
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
As a co-equal branch the House does not have to get the permission of anyone else.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
You missed the step where they are in the court and DOJ says the only answer is to impeach.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Also, isn’t up to those receiving subpoenas to go to court to quash them, if they believe the subpoena is not justified?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
When does 2 wrongs make a right. The House didn’t and neither are we. It’s not my job.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.