RR
R
I’mma take a stance here! Posting artwork made public on the internet is nothing but promotion for an artist. 9x outta 10 there is a signature or watermark. If you CROP those out it’s possible THEFT but reposting without naming the artist is OK. Reverse image search is yo friend.pic.twitter.com/nMpMhJXWB4
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
comparing an international corporation to somebody in their room who’s recognition could actually help them move forward in their career makes no actual sense man
monkey DO
.
That’s the nature of life.
That’s evolution.
All things are a REMIX!
Now tell me other artists ain’t studying other artists for inspiration.
Nah it ain’t like that. No one is going to care about your art if it can’t be shared. The most prolific art is shared time and time again. I’m all about sharing unedited art. Leave it to the artist to leave their MARK. Not everyone can be a curator who catalogs sources tho.pic.twitter.com/xiECan5rcp
-
-
We’re all just SOCIAL people... and social media takes TIME. Forgive rudies who have saved themselves a bit of time and lacked a credited source.pic.twitter.com/jSmRhDL3mY
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Take time and listen to the artists and respect them. Be big enough to admit you've done wrong and be better.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.