Interestingly, if you replace “incite internet mobs after them.” with “start a campaign to remove him from cons and get him blacklisted from the VA industry,” you get the exact pro-Vic argument people have been making. One is significantly more damaging than the other, though.
-
-
Replying to @canceledyy @EmilyChan556 and
Well now we’re getting into the proof realm, and unfortunately you’re the only person asserting anything that needs it. Got to prove Rekieta incited anything (harder than it sounds), and that Vic sexually harassed anyone. That’s a big ask, and otherwise you’re left with nothing.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @canceledyy @EmilyChan556 and
Because you made assertions with a material impact on someone’s life. You’re welcome to think Vic’s a scumbag personally, but if you have any logical consistency you’d want some kind of provable sequence of events if you think he deserves having his life ruined.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @canceledyy @J_Weenus and
You are allowed to believe victims, and you can stand for due process at the same time. One does not exclude the other, does it?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @canceledyy @J_Weenus and
Attack, what attack. You mean the insults that they can shield themselves from by getting off social media like every lawyers would tell you to. Don’t want to get “attacked”, don’t go in public.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I’m very proud with this community for attacking back (the real word for this is defending) people who attacks a man out of nowhere. Stand up against bullies and reap what you sow. Simple as that. Welcome to the real world
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.