Interestingly, if you replace “incite internet mobs after them.” with “start a campaign to remove him from cons and get him blacklisted from the VA industry,” you get the exact pro-Vic argument people have been making. One is significantly more damaging than the other, though.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @canceledyy @EmilyChan556 and
Well now we’re getting into the proof realm, and unfortunately you’re the only person asserting anything that needs it. Got to prove Rekieta incited anything (harder than it sounds), and that Vic sexually harassed anyone. That’s a big ask, and otherwise you’re left with nothing.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @canceledyy @EmilyChan556 and
Because you made assertions with a material impact on someone’s life. You’re welcome to think Vic’s a scumbag personally, but if you have any logical consistency you’d want some kind of provable sequence of events if you think he deserves having his life ruined.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Victim or not, you don’t gain more power of doing whatever you want like unlawful activities like defamations. Victims aren’t exempt from the law. Pick your actions wisely or pay for it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.