1/ This is an important point to understand about power posing, and I shoulda addressed it Monday http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2791272 …
2/ The statistical argument is that when you look at the so-called p-curve of different positive power-posing results, the pattern that
-
-
3/ emerges is what you'd expect if the effect of power-posing was zero, but random noise + publication bias led to positive findings and
-
4/4 publications. If this argument is right, it renders the "But we have these X positive findings!" claim totally moot.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.