Dee's right, though.
-
-
Replying to @Creature_SH
you should read the article! http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/09/the-case-against-hillary-clintons-deplorables-view.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jessesingal
While you do make some valid points, I believe that you overshot by far. This is NOT the time to coddle open-and-out racists.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Creature_SH @jessesingal
In fact, I believe that this coddling and "okay, but" is part of what got us into this fucking mess.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Creature_SH @jessesingal
The measured approach would work if all sides were capable of measured self-reflection. But that is not the case.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Creature_SH @jessesingal
Right now is the time to push back hard.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Creature_SH
anyway all's I'm saying is we're having a tactical disagreement. Different from saying I'm racist for disagreeing
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Creature_SH
ehhhhh defending racists, whatever. tis twitter and not a big deal. just annoying
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jessesingal
I'd say your reaction to some criticism was not very measured.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Criticism itself wasn't very measured, but anyway, twitter is dumb
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.