activists understand local rhetorical situation better than the "objective truth" journo who gets trotted out by detractors.
-
-
Replying to @litui
well we're talking about different issues here. Overall I (perhaps unsurprisingly) take the Dregerian view that truth and SJ gotta
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @jessesingal
I agree in the eventual goals department (tm), but immediate practical concerns don't always have time to sit around and wait.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
it's not always about objective scientific truth, but combating the perspectives held by detractors. Truth sometimes wins.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
see climate change. Sometimes it needs to be made about tangential affairs and "because we say so" rather than objectivity.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @litui
sure, a lot of this does come down to difference between journo and activism tho
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jessesingal
I know, and I realize we'll spin wheels going nowhere due to that gap. Your work still frames the data, activist or not...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
...the care you take with the neutrality of that framing is important as I'm sure you know. Illusion of neutrality too...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
the framing of neutrality gets used to claim the science is conclusive regardless of the substance. People don't get science.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
-
Replying to @jessesingal
honestly I don't think trans people have as much of a problem with the science you present as it seems, more the context...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
context being a world where we're not done fighting and it's not academic to most of us.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.