I've read some really interesting queer critiques of btw. One poped up here: http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/08/why-straight-men-have-sex-with-each-other.html …
-
-
Replying to @jessesingal
oh totally. Straight peeps can be gay as hell ;). The words we use are often convenient, context-sensitive, stigmatized, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jessesingal
I know your work tries to serve science, but given credit for pragmatism see why being "disproven" in popular press undermines?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
sorry, I tried too hard to fit everything in one tweet. Dropped too many important connectors. Retry:
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
I know your work looks at the science, data, and tries to create a picture that reflects a scientific awareness of transness...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
but we still have a need for pragmatic activism that adjusts its message to best serve trans lives. Your platform is larger ...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
than many of ours, and whether your view is popular or not, it can end up undermining our activism due to its accessibility...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
which is not to take a hardline stance against what you do, but the rhetoric directed your way is often self-aware, necessary.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @litui @jessesingal
your work gets used to block the work we do at times. It sucks, but there it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The groups trying ot keep trans kids out of bathrooms will use whatever scraps they can find
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.