1/ Here's my piece about the so-called "desistance" data regarding transgender and gender-dysphoric kids http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/07/whats-missing-from-the-conversation-about-transgender-kids.html …
let's just email if you wanna discuss. Article was meant as a very general-audience rundown of what we know
-
-
Let's talk here. You submitted your article for public consumption, it should be able to stand up to scrutiny. And it doesn't.
-
After 2 pieces like this, it's not reaching to say that you're overlooking the weakness of evidence to tell a story you like.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
it's not even that though. It's using the public's limited understanding of methodology to tell a slanted story
-
has a lot more in common with propaganda then scientific journalism
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.