2/ @TjZimmer I appreciated. But I'd love to hear a more fleshed-out version of what your "rules" would be if you got to decide which
1/ @TjZimmer Hey -- am only putting you on the spot because you were gutsy enough to lay out your free-speech views in an article, which
-
-
-
3/
@TjZimmer speech does and doesn't deserve protection. Might be for space/word/count reasons but thought it was underdefined in your - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@TjZimmer@jessesingal Oh that's good, because speech can't undermine "political equality", so there's no problem then. -
@TjZimmer@jessesingal To the extent "political equality" means anything, it's that the laws apply to everyone and everyone gets to vote. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@TjZimmer and shouldn't be protected, therefore?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TjZimmer ah okay. so people get to vote on what speech is and isn't protected?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TjZimmer@jessesingal Why not just invent a NEW systems rather than go back to traditional models?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TjZimmer@jessesingal Curious: how granular is this? In this town statement X is permitted, next door no?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@TjZimmer@jessesingal oh of course. But that's typically not what the argument is about. -
@TjZimmer@jessesingal And note that if I actually did argue women shouldn't vote, which I'm allowed to do, society would shun me, correctly - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.