2/ that it is offensive to point out that there is an XX/XY genetic different w/r/t biological sex because something something TERFS will
-
-
-
3/ use it to do awful things (and I agree that TERFs suck). This is an utterly untenable position for a science writer to be in, and I'm
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@jessesingal It's not semantics to scientists. It's reality on one side, and sexist/homophobic activism on the other.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jessesingal honestly I think the problem is that xx/xy are necessary but not sufficient to define the human sexes considering other factorsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jessesingal but in the common use of xx/xy is acceptable IMO in as much as there's sufficient isolation in the majority of cases/subjects. -
@jessesingal yet when talking about trans issues it's something that should be given less significance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@gendercoping
@wildlx@dippynicky@jessesingal Such a meaningless silencing word. As loosely defined as TG.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JackyHolyoake yeah, I wasn't trying push any personal views. There basic issues about definitions are not just opinions of mineThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JackyHolyoake I actually agree. looking back on that stuff it seems clear that I wasn't really helping. I should compile some stuffThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@JackyHolyoake to be honest,Ive only been on twitter a few months & I'm new at these excitable backandforths.They dont feel super productiveThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.