Are there normal circumstances under which a researcher would say p<.1 is cool rather than p<.05? Could I be missing simple explanation?
@wccubbison Gotcha. Do you normally need to explain why you're loosening the definition?
-
-
@jessesingal maybe with reviewers? But as long as you are explicit about effect size & significance no need to reject on those groundsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jessesingal Gelman and Jeff Gill and others have gone to war over the abuse of .05Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.