2/ side understand why it's discomfiting to see statements like "Jobs should go to the most qualified applicant" on university-sanctioned
-
-
-
3/ documents about microaggressions. That's weird and a *completely* different beast from "Can I touch your hair?"
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@SolJewasaurus I mean I'm not opposed to affirmative-action, but the point is that isn't some crazy beyond-the-pale statement
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SolJewasaurus gotta leave room for people to disagree about stuff!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@LouiseMensch@jessesingal Me too. Anybody who knows what they'e doing should be banned from applying.....Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
@spacekatboy
@LouiseMensch Did you guys read the whole thread? You realize we AGREE that that's a silly sentence to criticize?
End of conversation
-
-
-
@LouiseMensch @spacekatboy Christ, your reading comprehension! I've been tweeting for 30 mins about overzealous "microaggression" stuffThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@LouiseMensch Qualifications and talent are not the same. I interviewed ppl with 2:1s that could not do things i did aged 10. I have a 2:2.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@LouiseMensch pt2. Are you saying a talented guitarist in a rock group should be rejected because someone less talented has a Phd in music?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.