@sTeamTraen @PhDefunct Why the ha ha ha? Isn't that exactly what happened?
@PhDefunct @sTeamTraen Ah, okay. Yeah I think we're in agreement. Important question is why ppl weren't more skeptical here, of course
-
-
@jessesingal@PhDefunct Probably a lot of people expressed skepticism... at the bar. Standard of proof needed to raise questions is too highThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jessesingal@PhDefunct That's why we must have pro-active publication of all data, methods, and code, so I can check your work without 1/2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jessesingal@PhDefunct ...having to appear to confront you. I can do my analyses quietly in my own time and if I'm wrong, no harm done 2/2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jessesingal@PhDefunct Imagine 1st sci journal ever appeared tomorrow. Does anyone think it would contain summary tables and no dataset?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@jessesingal@sTeamTraen I think that is easy: collective confirmation bias and wishful thinking re a sociopolitical issue -
@PhDefunct@sTeamTraen Yeah. + me and many other journalists are more conditioned to look for questionable effect sizes/stat significance - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.