JesseJenkins

@JesseJenkins

Macro-energy systems engineering, optimization, and policy with a focus on the electricity sector. Professor (Dept of MAE) & .

Joined October 2008

Tweets

You blocked @JesseJenkins

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @JesseJenkins

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Dec 4

    What does an "economy-forward" agenda look like? How do we take politics as "the point of entry" for designing effective climate policy? What can the Biden Administration really do to make progress this year? Listen to here:

    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    9 hours ago

    How to use govt procurement to spur adoption of ? Follow Sr. Fellow Dorothy Robyn's step-by-step plan cc

    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    14 hours ago

    I'm looking forward to speaking at the Energy Systems and Optimization Workshop later this week! Great lineup and thrilled to be in a session with , , and . Workshop is virtual - register soon:

    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    Dec 5

    If you're on here a month since the election scraeming about voter fraud (which was virtually non-existent), then maybe your policy arguments about every other topic are also not Good and you should be ignored from now until the heat death of the universe

    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. Retweeted
    Dec 4

    Man still thinking about 's paper. Yeah like whatever just wrote a Science paper all by my lonesome. Jesus, like wtaf.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    Dec 4

    Shout out to all the students who are struggling to make it through the semester under incredibly difficult circumstances. You're doing amazing.

    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    Dec 4

    In our latest work, we model the decarbonisation of the sector-coupled European energy system using uninterrupted hourly modelling, network interconnections and myopic approach. A summary of the paper published in with in this thread

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Retweeted
    Dec 4

    Do we need Carbon Capture & Storage? Yes, probably need more than we can feasibly build... Here is my presentation, where I dissect a scenario, hosted by

    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Dec 4
    Replying to

    I've also been very frustrated by McKinsey's complete opacity about the data and methods they used for their MAC curves. How can anyone tell whether their cost estimates are plausible if we can't see their data and methods?

    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    Dec 4

    MAC curves are a fundamentally flawed tool because they completely fail to account for path-dependency. Don't believe me? Look at the difference between McKinsey MAC curves today and a decade or so ago. Suppose the current one is right, then the old one was *hopelessly* wrong.

    Undo
  11. Dec 4
    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    Dec 4
    Undo
  13. Dec 4

    Hey hey, 30k. Thanks for following everyone! I'll try not to dissapoint...

    Undo
  14. Retweeted
    Dec 4
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Dec 3

    It's unbelievable how much govts are asking of individuals while providing no economic support for struggling families and businesses.

    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    Dec 3

    🏭🧑‍🏭Out in Science today: decarbonizing US electricity by 2035 only strands about 15% of capacity-years, based on typical lifespans. Setting explicit deadlines can help with the . 🧑‍🏭🏭 Paper: Interactive map:

    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    Dec 3

    In a new working paper, & I try to clarify the relationship carbon removal/NETs & carbon capture and storage (CCS). Our message? Stop obsessing over tech categories and focus on 2 questions: where does the carbon come from and where does it go? 🧵

    A matrix showing how the source and destination of captured carbon determines its role in climate policy.
    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    Dec 3

    This is a super cool idea by and happens to be one that and I can use as an excuse to fire up the way way way back machine and highlight our paper on National Institutes of Energy from ... 2009.

    Undo
  19. Dec 4

    Absolutely correct. Time is of the essence, we are already far behind schedule on climate mitigation. Order of operations: eliminate coal emissions, then natural gas and oil. When that's done, we can talk about nuclear. Is this a climate crisis or not?

    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    Dec 3
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·