Conversation

“PhD economist” in bio is the new pronouns in bio.
Quote Tweet
The more I read about crypto, the more I realise how useless they are. Bitcoin can (theoretically) handle 7 transaction per second, at the cost of 2,500 kWh (an average home uses about 1,000 kWh per month). A transaction takes about 10 minutes to be settled.
Show this thread
67
72
948
pronouns in bio isn't a good indicator of anything other than what the person's preferred pronouns are, anyways
6
8
What if I don't use your pronouns? Am I a bigot? Pronouns in bio is as useful as whatever flag is currently recommended to virtue signaling. Expect none of them is a virtue, they are actually a "I obey" signaling.
1
2
It depends on your reason. If it's because you're bigoted towards people like them, then yeah that would make you a bigot. Or maybe you're illiterate, or just rude. In any case, it's no different than calling someone by the name they introduce themselves with.
2
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
so generally in social situations we have "reasonable" and "unreasonable" expectations for deferense towards other people's behavioral preferences. what is reasonable or polite or not is of course subjective depending on the culture, so I'll speak to my own cultural context.
1
1
calling someone by their preferred pronoun is on par with calling them by their preferred name in terms of difficulty, and so generally isn't considered a burden. this is what makes the insistence to _not_ do that sus if not offensive, at least in the modern social context.
2
Replying to and
there are also infinite names. in your memory you can just append the person's pronoun to their name, if it's that important to them. personally, I prefer the neutral "they/them" but am fine with "he/him" too, since that's what most people were trained to call people like me.
2
Show replies
Show more replies