Conversation

If you've been holding your #LUNA / #UST with custodians, it's time to make your voices heard. There's a view that if you had a balance on exchange, you must have been a seller (traitor), not a hodler, and therefore deserve no consideration in any bailout/fork/airdrop scenario.
70
54
348
2/ Other reasons to custody on-exchange besides intent to sell: * you bought and never withdrew * you don't trust yourself with custody * balance too small to justify self-custody hassle / transfer fees * collateral value / account equity for margin * staking
7
2
79
3/ A big advantage of working with custodians on airdrops is that we generally have KYC'd accounts and can identify unique individuals. Purely looking on-chain, you don't know if it's 1 guy with 1000 wallets. Downside is that some legal restrictions on distribution could apply.
4
7
44
1. I'm shocked that the Foundation doesn't already have established contacts at the supporting exchanges but it should be easy enough to get connected to the relevant parties. 2. yes, we have done many airdrops and it's easy to snapshot balances as of any time/blockheight.
2
1
14
Show replies
Replying to
cuando nadie compraba luna.. muchos vendimos en perdidas nuestras otras carteras y compramos en firentes entradas para tratar de que no caiga mas... tampoco merecemos??? si es asi.. me equivoque de comunidad.
1
Replying to
I see a lot of resentment against centralized exchanges since they don't participate in governance and don't contribute much in developing the base software of the underlying chain. They hold a significant portion of the stake and without that getting to quorum on voting is hard.
2
At least in cosmos chains, the staking token is the governance token. But the exchanges provide them just as another option for generating staking rewards. People holding them on exchanges need to realize that they are buying a stake in the network and need to participate.
1
Show replies
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Show