Conversation

One big learning from college Statistics class: the “experts” rarely produce a study that isn’t fatally flawed, obviously biased or completely misinterpreted. “The Science” is not raw data — it’s some biased “expert” puppet’s uncritical interpretation of cherry-picked data. twitter.com/EPoe187/status

This Tweet is unavailable.

349

Jesse Powell

@jespow

What you also don’t see are all the studies and data that were thrown away/buried because they supported the opposite of the desired narrative. You wonder why they didn’t collect some super helpful data point and maybe they did but excluded/obfuscated it for the target outcome.

6:01 AM · Feb 9, 2022Twitter for iPhone

Replying to

Quote Tweet

· Feb 1

Replying to @THEREALESMITTY

First

let’s get get these exchanges to honor their commitments to their customers @BittrexUS @krakenfx @jespow @richiela

Replying to

Ancel Keys prime example. Cc

Replying to

I blame #Aristotle! (Just write if you disagree.) cc:

Replying to

That’s a pretty cynical, postmodern view of all experts. So what’s the solution? Trust no reports? Doubt everyones motives? Honest question

Replying to

dm me asap

Replying to

It could be Out of understanding sometimes

Fish Quest game dev and yelling

Replying to

log off

Replying to

Very true. When I was running a 6 Sigma Continuous Improvement effort I was always very careful to include as much of the data as possible in the reports. Any data that was excluded was available and a reason given for the exclusion….. falsification etc.

Replying to

Remember the time they convinced the everyone that plant food would destroy the world?

Show more replies