Conversation

I’m all for synthetic wombs to replace surrogate labor (assuming we can identify and fully replicate the important parts of the experience). The real problem is the 18-year 24/7 startup that’s always on the brink of failing. We need robots or tribes. The nuclear family is busted.
Quote Tweet
Replying to @DeepCipher @shl and @elonmusk
Disparities in economic success between men and women are far larger once marriage+children enter the picture. Synthetic wombs would remove the high burden of pregnancy, significantly reducing the inequality. vox.com/2018/2/19/1701
Replying to
You don't think that this might have a massive emotional and psychological impact on how mothers relate to their children when they just pop out of a robot in the corner 9 months later instead of literally being carried in the womb for 9 months with the mother experiencing that?
3
1
18
We are animals, with animal instincts, and social and familial structures derived from those instincts. Trying to deviate from and distort and "optimize" those is literal insanity coming from a denial of what we are as human beings.
1
1
13
Show replies
“18-year 24/7 startup that’s always on the brink of failing” == a child. What you said makes no sense.
1
1
Show replies
Replying to
Is the nuclear family busted? or is the economy that would normally empower a nuclear families' success busted? seems to me the nuclear family wasn't busted until wages stopped keeping up with productivity. Today, you choose between family or money.
1
10
Intentional dismantling. Nuclear family is the strongest bond that holds society together. Dismantling it has allowed all this bullshit the past handful of years
1
7
Show replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more