Conversation

>if they had built a platform to buy and sell images that wasn’t nominally based on crypto, I don’t think it would have taken off...because this is a gold rush. It wouldn't have taken off because it would have been riddled with payment fraud, forgeries and regulatory problems.
Quote Tweet
Wrote some notes summarizing my first impressions of web3: moxie.org/2022/01/07/web
7
5
79
Replying to
>I can run my own mail server, but it doesn’t functionally matter for privacy, censorship resistance, or control – because GMail is going to be on the other end of every email... But how far would Gmail go if you didn't have the option to run it yourself? The option has value.
4
2
39
>This might suggest that decentralization itself is not...of...importance to...people Where the decentralization happens is more important than how much of it is happening. Centralized oracles aren't as bad as centralized settlement, which is where the regulatory barriers are.
4
3
39
/🧵 I expect the crypto infra/oracle services to become more diversified over time. For the most part, coins are safe while at rest in a non-custodial wallet, and risk only happens at time of transfer. Most transfers are low value. High value transfers can verify for themselves.
2
1
14
Replying to
Yes but what about the Ethereum validators who decide to reorder the transaction history to put their bids in the blocks first? They get the first mints. Auctions on EVM still have some serious problems that need to be solved.