Conversation

It should be highlighted that when a regulator "gathers information" it means millions of $ of legal costs and millions more in lost productivity incurred on the target. When no wrongdoing is found, the regulator doesn't reimburse for their transgression, nor even offer apology
17
26
336
This is an important point. It's unfortunate & misguided for regulators to handle fact-finding this way, under the guise of threats of enforcement actions rather than by engaging in a healthy & collaborative process. It's bad for everyone: the target, the regulator, & the people.
9
5
144
Replying to and
I fully agree. It also gives leverage for the practice of guidance by enforcement. In addition to fines & other concessions, regulators use settlement orders as a means to pronounce legal conclusions without challenge, & then they treat these orders as "precedent" (they aren't).
4
20
Show more replies