Conversation

Furthermore, who do you think we're the people on the other side of the trades? This seemed coordinated as only prexisting buy orders were really able to profit from this.
3
2
To add to this, the couple people that got to buy today at these prices are the people you will keep around. The thousands of users like myself who were wrongfully liquidated will not be using or promoting Kraken ever again.
1
6
Well, it's not "wrongfully" liquidated. It's liquidated according to the Terms. The movement was entirely predictable and just because the other exchanges didn't follow, it doesn't mean that it was impossible that they could have. Did you honestly not understand how it works?
5
5
To be fair, I'm on the defense :) I do have an open mind about the issue. What I'm hearing though is people saying they just didn't understand how markets work at the time they placed their orders.
5
1
If this is an issue, why it almost always happen with Kraken and If it happens with other exchanges, why they come forward and try to make thier traders whole? are they fool to do that?
1
2
Is it an issue? Does it happen on Kraken more than it happens elsewhere? What would making people "whole" entail? Covering your trading losses out of our own pockets even though you knew the risks you were taking?
4
2
Ofcourse it's an issue. If you guys have liquidity issue, why not act as a market maker or have MM firms to reduce spreads? If this happened in equities, they would have been discussing about it in the senate.
2
3
Everybody has a liquidity issue at some size. So, how much liquidity is enough? Should you be able to market sell $1m with < 0.1% price impact? $10m? $10b? It's not equities and we don't have a monopoly on trading crypto assets like stock exchanges have.
2
2
other exchanges were able to do much higher volume and absorb the move... in fact it appears all of them were except Kraken so how did they figure it out and not you ? it act like this is an unsolvable issue
2
3