Conversation

“Palo Alto — and you can find this data in the census — is increasingly an aging, silver retirement community. It's either — you bought in the seventies, eighties or nineties, or you struck it rich on the startup lottery. I know our town can be a hell of a lot more than that.”
Quote Tweet
As he enters his final weeks in office, #PaloAlto Mayor Adrian Fine discusses his frustrations with local leadership, hobbled quests to build more housing and hopes for future council members to move the city forward. paloaltoonline.com/news/2020/11/2
11
36
274
What’s wrong with it being just what it is? Presumably, it is acceptable for some place to be an aging, silver retirement community. Why not Palo Alto? Being “more” would be something different, which sounds like it’s at odds with the retirement community vibe residents enjoy.
3
1
Maybe but it could be that those things aren't desirable in PA. Improving scores in those areas might reduce the cost of labor but it might also be worth it to them to just pay the higher cost to maintain low scores there. Can't blame them for trading in their own interest.
2
1
If every city did this, it would lead to increased cost of living, decreased standard of living, increased commutes, increased homelessness, etc. And in fact, that's what every American city with job growth has done, which explains a lot of our societal ills.
1
20
I suppose you "can't blame" Palo Alto for selfishly guarding their own interests at the expense of the entire country, since every other city is doing the same thing. But you gotta recognize that this is very bad, and it would be better if we stopped cities from doing this.
1
18
Replying to and
lol, allowing a property owner to build an apartment building on their own property is not an "attack by invaders seeking to destroy". If you want to live in a low-density, high-priced retirement community, there are plenty in Florida far away from jobs. No risk of upzoning there
1
5
Show replies
1. sorry you feel the need to make personal attacks rather than addressing points of argument 2. presumably we agree that neighbors can enter in to agreements, HOAs, even create governments. If we've made an agreement and I've relied on that agreement, I expect you to keep it.
2
Show replies
I’m willing to bluntly tell you that ideally, no, you would not be able to make alternatives to your banal personal lifestyle preferences literally illegal. There should not be anywhere “safe” for you to prevent people from engaging in voluntary real estate transactions.
4
Show more replies